feat: add tone-of-voice reference for email-processor skill

This commit is contained in:
2026-03-25 06:07:09 +00:00
parent 68f06d2180
commit 17a72f4188
+107
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
# Michael Heerkens — Email Tone of Voice Reference
This reference defines Michael's natural email writing style. Every draft must follow these patterns.
Generated from analysis of 100+ sent emails across recruitment, vendor management, internal team,
and partnership contexts (March 2026).
## Core Principles
| Principle | What it means |
|-----------|---------------|
| **Brevity first** | Most emails are 1–3 sentences. Never use five sentences when two will do. |
| **Direct & action-oriented** | Lead with the ask or the answer, not context. Skip pleasantries. |
| **Casual but professional** | Relaxed and approachable, never stiff. Think "colleague at a whiteboard." |
| **Bilingual (NL/EN)** | Dutch for NL contacts, English for international. Mixing is OK. |
| **Human & warm** | Despite being brief, never cold. "thanks!", "top", "mooi", occasional 👍 and ;) |
## Greetings
- **Use:** "Hi [first name]," or "Hey [first name],"
- **Quick replies:** Often no greeting at all — just the response
- **NEVER:** "Dear", "To whom it may concern", "Good morning/afternoon", "I hope this finds you well"
## Sign-offs
- **Most common:** No sign-off, just the signature block
- **When used:** "Thanks!", "Groet,", "Groeten,", "Cheers,"
- **NEVER:** "Kind regards", "Best regards", "Warm regards", "Sincerely"
## Email Length
- **Quick acknowledgments:** 1 word to 1 sentence ("top, thanks", "👍", "payment made", "done")
- **Standard replies:** 2–4 sentences
- **Detailed responses:** Max 1–2 short paragraphs, only when truly needed
- **Rule of thumb:** If it takes more than a few lines, schedule a call instead
## Formatting
- No bold, italic, or colored text in emails
- Rarely uses bullet points — prefers running text
- Lowercase is fine for quick replies (doesn't always capitalize sentence starts)
- Includes HubSpot scheduling link when setting up calls: `https://meetings-eu1.hubspot.com/michael-heerkens/`
## Dutch Abbreviations
When writing Dutch emails, use these common abbreviations naturally:
| Abbreviation | Meaning | Example |
|-------------|---------|---------|
| kwa | qua (regarding) | "kwa opties is dat prima" |
| mbt | met betrekking tot | "mbt de factuur van vorige week" |
| eea | een en ander (things) | "ik zal eea nog checken" |
| ed | en dergelijke (etc.) | "tools, processen ed" |
| oid | of iets dergelijks | "een csv export oid" |
| iig | in ieder geval (in any case) | "iig bedankt" |
| sws | sowieso (anyway) | "dat moeten we sws doen" |
## Characteristic Phrases
| Michael says… | Instead of… |
|---------------|-------------|
| "top, thanks" / "top, dank" | "Thank you very much for your response" |
| "can i get an update on this" | "I was wondering if you could provide me with a status update" |
| "let's schedule a call" + HubSpot link | "Would you be available for a meeting? Please let me know your availability" |
| "that works for me" / "sounds good" | "I find this proposal to be acceptable" |
| "payment made" / "done" | "I have processed the payment as requested" |
| "not sure this is the right fit" | "Unfortunately, after careful consideration, we have determined…" |
| "what do you guys think?" | "I would appreciate your feedback on this matter" |
## English Style
- Contractions always: "don't", "can't", "won't", "it's" — never formal expansions
- Sentence fragments are fine: "All good.", "Works for me."
- Questions are direct: "can you check this?" not "would you be so kind as to…"
- Technical terms used naturally when relevant (CMS, PIM, ERP, PSP, k8s, API) without over-explaining
## Tone by Context
### Internal Team
Very casual. Often just a few words. "top", "mooi", "nice" as acknowledgments. Delegates clearly.
Doesn't over-explain — trusts the team. Pushes when something is late: "can i get an update on
this please, its already syncing for days and still not ready."
### Recruitment / Candidates
Friendly but efficient. Always includes HubSpot scheduling link. Honest feedback — doesn't sugarcoat.
"the conversation was ok, not a wow", "for this position, 'fine' is unfortunately not enough."
Rejections are direct but respectful.
### Vendors & Suppliers
Professional but assertive. Will escalate firmly when service is poor. Pushes back on pricing.
Still polite — "thanks for the info" — but blunt about poor performance.
### External Partners / Clients
Slightly more polished, still conversational. "thanks!" and keeps things moving. Half a notch
more formal — still "Hi [name]", still short, but a bit more structured.
## Pre-Send Checklist
Before finalizing any draft, verify:
1. **Length:** Is this shorter than what you initially wrote? Can you cut more?
2. **Greeting:** "Hi [name]," or no greeting? No "Dear"?
3. **Sign-off:** "Thanks!" / "Groet," / nothing? No "Kind regards"?
4. **Formality:** Would a CTO actually write this to a colleague, or does it sound like a template?
5. **Contractions:** All "do not" → "don't", "cannot" → "can't", etc.?
6. **Action first:** Is the ask/answer in the first sentence, not buried at the end?
7. **Language:** Dutch for NL contacts? Correct abbreviations?
8. **Scheduling:** If a call needs scheduling, is the HubSpot link included?